I'm one of Circle's earliest users. Convology+ runs on it. I've migrated dozens of clients onto it. Here's my honest, specific take on what Circle does better than anything else in the market — and who it's actually built for.
I got started on Circle in early 2020 — one of the first people on the platform. I started on their legacy plans, was grandfathered through their pricing changes, and have upgraded several times as Convology+ has grown. Today I run my entire community business on it — the discussions, the events, the courses, the replays, the onboarding, the access control, all of it.
That's the lens this page is written through. Not someone who tested Circle for 90 days and wrote a review. Someone who has this open on a monitor all day, every day, for five years.
Circle is a community platform. That's the category. But the category description undersells it in one specific way that I think is the most important thing to understand before you look at any feature list.
Every community platform can technically host discussions. Every one can technically host a course. Every one can technically handle a membership paywall. What Circle does that the others don't is make all of it look genuinely good. Clean. Polished. Considered. The kind of interface where your members think "this is a professional product" rather than "this is duct-taped together."
Aesthetics and presentation aren't usually how I evaluate software. I evaluate on capability and ROI. But in community platforms, presentation is capability. If your members don't enjoy being in the space, they don't come back. Circle understood this from day one, and it shows in every part of the product — the way posts look, the way events are displayed, the way content is organized. The interface flexes enormous complexity without ever exposing that complexity to your members.
Circle was founded in 2020 by Sid Yadav, Rudy Santino, and Andrew Guttormsen — all three were on the founding team at Teachable. The Teachable DNA shows in how seriously Circle takes course and content delivery. The platform has grown to include live events, email marketing, website building, AI agents, automation workflows, and its own MCP server.
The most common objection to Circle is the price. At $89/month for Professional and $199 for Business, Circle is not the cheapest option. I'm not going to argue that it is. But I am going to argue that most people raising the price objection are doing the math wrong — and that the actual pricing gotcha in this space belongs to a different platform entirely.
Circle charges a transaction fee when you process payments through their native paywall system — 2% on Professional, 1% on Business, on top of Stripe's standard 2.9% + $0.30. This is the most-cited criticism of Circle.
First: using Circle's paywalls is optional. You can process externally through ThriveCart, HighLevel, SureCart, or anything else and grant Circle access via Zapier or API. You will not pay Circle a fee.
Second: the reason to use Circle's paywalls isn't because they're the only option — it's because they're so deeply integrated with the rest of the platform that the time they save is worth more than the fee. When someone buys through a Circle paywall, they're automatically added to the right access group, which automatically grants access to the right spaces, courses, and events. No zap required. No webhook to maintain. No connection breaking at 2am. On my Business plan, I pay 1% for that reliability. At $900/year for a Convology+ membership, that's $9 per transaction. I have never once hesitated at that number.
To put it in perspective: to pay $2,500 in Circle transaction fees in a year, you'd have to process $250,000 in revenue. If you're doing that and a 1% fee is your biggest complaint, you're doing exceptionally well.
Circle's Email Hub starts at $19/month for up to 1,000 contacts. I pay $19/month. I use it for member onboarding, workflow-triggered emails, and integrating my community with my lead generation. If I have 500 members paying $97/month or $900/year, I'm generating serious revenue. The $228/year I'm spending on email is a laughably small number in that context.
The people most loudly criticizing Circle's email pricing are, in my observation, not yet making meaningful money from their community. The math only looks bad if your community isn't generating revenue. Start where you can afford to start. The platform will grow with you.
Here's what doesn't get nearly enough attention in any platform comparison. Skool processes payments through their own system, not Stripe. That means your subscribers are Skool's customers, stored in Skool's system. If you want to leave Skool, you cannot migrate your active subscriptions. Your members would have to manually re-subscribe on whatever platform you move to — and a meaningful percentage won't.
Circle processes payments directly through Stripe. Your subscribers are in your Stripe account. You own the billing relationship. If you ever move off Circle, you take your subscribers with you.
I find the framing where Skool's payment ownership model is glossed over while Circle's 1% transaction fee is treated as the major pricing concern to be a significant distortion of where the actual financial risk lies. You can always negotiate with a processor. You can't migrate subscriptions you don't own.
The foundational difference between Circle and every other community platform is organizational depth. Skool gives you one feed organized with topic tags. Circle gives you Spaces — dedicated areas that can each be their own discussion forum, course, resource library, event space, or chat channel.
In Convology+, I have a TechHelp space where members ask questions about specific tools. A resource library where years of content is organized and searchable. An events section where all upcoming and past events live in an aggregated view. Course sections organized into launch and growth phases. Each is a distinct space with its own purpose, organization, and access controls.
The posting experience is the best I've used on any community platform. Members can create posts with rich markdown: headings, numbered lists, block quotes, code blocks, polls, image embeds, video, audio recordings, voice messages. It's elevated compared to a standard forum — between a well-formatted document and a social post. And critically, it's easy enough that members actually use it.
Access groups are the best implementation of access control I've seen across any major community tool. Think of an access group as a bucket — you put spaces, courses, and event spaces inside it. Anyone added to the bucket gets access to everything in it, and any future changes to what's in the bucket apply retroactively to all members.
Before access groups, if I added 100 members to three specific courses and later combined them into something new, I'd have to manually re-upload spreadsheets and re-grant access retroactively. Every external tool connecting to Circle had to be updated individually. Every change was a production.
With access groups, I make the change once — I update what's inside the bucket — and every member gets the updated access automatically. Add a new course to Convology+ and every existing Convology+ member gets it immediately. No CSV uploads. No manual adjustments. No Zapier updates to maintain.
What makes access groups exceptional is the many ways someone can be added to one:
Circle has two event formats. Live rooms are interactive — cameras on, microphones on, everyone in a gallery view. Think Zoom-style. Live streams are one-to-many broadcasts where you present to an audience that engages via chat and Q&A. For most community businesses, you need both. Circle delivers both natively.
What makes Circle events exceptional isn't the format options — it's the integration. When I go live in Circle, my members don't open a Zoom link in a different tab. A notification appears inside Circle: I'm live, click to join. The event lives where the community lives. There is no seam between "the community" and "the event."
The event system also supports paid events, replay access, and access restrictions tied to access groups. I use this for workshops that certain member tiers can RSVP for and others can only see — a FOMO mechanism built directly into the event structure. Free-tier members can see the event and who's attending. Joining requires a membership upgrade.
Circle's native paywall system is their built-in checkout. It processes through Stripe, handles one-time payments and subscriptions, supports order bumps and upsells. None of that is the reason I use it.
The reason I use it is that the moment someone completes a transaction, Circle knows. The access group gets updated. The spaces and courses unlock. A workflow fires a welcome DM. The whole onboarding chain runs automatically because the payment, the community access, and the automation are all inside the same platform, reading from the same data.
The alternative — processing externally and connecting via Zapier — works. I have clients who do it. But "works" is different from "seamless." External integrations introduce points of failure. They require maintenance. They occasionally break at inconvenient times. The paywall adds 1-2% to your transaction cost in exchange for eliminating all of that.
Paywalls also handle bumps and upsells well. Someone buys the base membership and gets added to the Convology+ access group. They add the upgrade and get added to a second access group that unlocks additional content. All automatic, all native, zero additional tooling required.
Circle's Workflows are their automation builder. What makes them different from HighLevel's workflows isn't feature breadth — HighLevel's engine is more powerful by scope. What makes Circle's different is proximity to the community.
In HighLevel, a workflow handles CRM, email, SMS, funnels, phone calls, and a dozen other things. That scope is a feature and a complexity tax simultaneously. When I need a workflow that does something community-specific — add a member to a space when they join an access group, send a DM seven days after someone joins — the HighLevel workflow requires 10 steps where Circle's requires 1.
The triggers are community-native: someone gets added to an access group, joins a space, purchases through a paywall, posts in a specific space, a member anniversary occurs. The actions are community-native: send a DM, add to an access group, remove from a space, send an email. They're not connected to the community via API — they are the community.
My most used workflow: when someone joins Convology+, the workflow fires immediately — a welcome DM introducing them to the community, pointing toward specific spaces, asking them to introduce themselves. Seven days later, a follow-up DM. It took 20 minutes to build. No external tools. No zaps.
Circle's Email Hub is an add-on, not a core feature. But the reason to consider it over an external email platform isn't the features — it's the integration. When I use Circle's email, it knows who my members are, what access groups they're in, what content they've engaged with, and what events they've attended. That context makes workflow-triggered emails genuinely intelligent in a way external tools connected via Zapier can only approximate.
My division: I use Circle email for member onboarding sequences triggered by workflow, for communications about community activity, and for launch emails targeting specific member segments. I use HighLevel for everything that reaches people who aren't members. Circle email handles community-context communications. HighLevel handles the broader business operations layer.
For people without an existing email stack, Circle's Email Hub is a genuine option. The integration with workflows is where the real value is — trigger an email when someone joins an access group, when a subscription renews, when a member hasn't posted in 30 days. That kind of behavioral email requires your email tool to understand your community, and Circle's does.
Circle's website builder produces landing pages and simple sites tightly integrated with your community. For specific use cases, it's genuinely excellent. For others, it's not ready to replace a more capable platform.
What it does brilliantly: pages tightly integrated with your community. Sales pages where Circle already knows if the visitor is logged in. Protected content pages where access is controlled by access groups. Workshop replay pages where video is gated behind a paywall. Lead magnet pages that add someone to a Circle form and trigger a workflow.
I use the website builder for exactly this: workshops, lead magnets, access restriction pages, replay pages with protected video embeds. The tight integration with access groups is where it shines — a webpage where the content you can see is determined by your community membership status is something no WordPress plugin stack handles as cleanly.
What it doesn't replace: a full-featured marketing site with SEO blog, complex navigation, and flexible design control. Give it another year or two and that gap will likely close. For now, use it for integration-heavy landing pages where Circle's connective tissue is the actual advantage.
Circle is the only major community platform with an official MCP (Model Context Protocol) server. This enables AI tools and agents to natively interact with your Circle community — reading member data, community content, and activity without custom API work. It's a significant signal of where the platform is heading on AI integration, and the head start is real.
Not full feature tables — just my honest positions based on real use of all three. The full comparison pages are coming. Here's the version that will help you orient right now.
Skool is simpler, cheaper ($99/month flat), and has something Circle genuinely doesn't have: a built-in discovery marketplace where potential members can find your community organically.
But there's something else Skool offers that nobody talks about honestly: social belonging and identity. Skool has cultivated a specific ecosystem — shaped significantly by Alex Hormozi's involvement — and being a "Skooler" carries cultural weight in certain circles. If you want to visibly align with that community, that identity, that network of people, that's actually a legitimate reason to choose Skool. Communities are partly about outward expression of belonging, and there's nothing wrong with choosing a platform partly because of who else is there.
That said: Skool processes payments through their own system, not Stripe. Your active subscriptions are not portable. If you ever want to leave, your members need to manually re-subscribe. You do not own those billing relationships the way you do on Circle, where everything runs through your own Stripe account.
Skool also has no workflows, no native email, no RSVP access control, no invite links, no access groups. The organizational depth is not comparable. Circle gives you a designed environment. Skool gives you a very good room.
HighLevel is a business operating system that includes a community feature. Circle is a community platform that includes business tools. Those are different things built for different primary needs.
I use both. My community runs on Circle. My CRM, email marketing, funnels, and automations run on HighLevel. They complement each other through Circle's API and Zapier. I have clients who moved from Circle to HighLevel because consolidation outweighed experience difference. I have others who use HighLevel for everything else and Circle for their community because the member experience is meaningfully better.
The decision comes down to one question: is the community the product or a feature of the product? If community is the product, Circle wins. If community is one component of a broader operating system, HighLevel's community feature may be good enough to justify keeping everything consolidated.
Mighty Networks has been in this space since 2010 and has real feature depth. But it's clunky in ways Circle isn't. The interface feels bloated. Client feedback I've gotten consistently is that the Mighty Networks admin experience requires more cognitive load to accomplish equivalent tasks. Clients who've migrated off describe the switch as immediately relieving.
On mobile: Circle has a full, complete mobile app experience. I use it every single day. It's clean, fast, covers all major features, and push notifications work through it. The app is branded Circle, not your brand name. That's fine — see the Circle Plus section below if the branding matters to you.
The product shipping velocity difference is significant. Circle launched 200+ user-requested features in the past year. Mighty Networks has improved but can't match that pace.
The platform does too many things to give a universal yes or no. Here's how to think about fit honestly.
If people are paying for access to the community experience — the discussions, the events, the connections — Circle was built for exactly this. It shows in every design decision.
Member retention is directly tied to whether being in your community feels good. Circle invests in aesthetics and presentation in a way no other platform in this space does.
Access groups, invite links, paywall integration, workflow-triggered access changes — Circle handles all of this natively. The cleanest implementation I've seen.
Members get a notification in the community and click to join. No Zoom link. No separate tab. No seam between the community and the event.
Payments through Circle are payments through your Stripe account. Your subscribers are yours. If you ever move, they come with you. Not a minor consideration.
Start where you can sustain it. Skool at $99/month or HighLevel at $97/month for a broader toolset are legitimate starting points. Migrations are straightforward — I've done dozens of them. Come to Circle when the revenue supports it.
Skool's built-in discovery marketplace is a real growth mechanism Circle doesn't have an equivalent for. If you're early-stage and you want people to find you through the platform's network, Skool's ecosystem is a genuine advantage.
If community is not the primary product and you're already paying for HighLevel, the community feature there may be enough. Paying $89/month for Circle on top of $97/month for HighLevel is hard to justify if you're not using Circle's differentiated features.
Circle's course features are good, not exceptional. If courses are the main product and community is secondary, a dedicated LMS like Kajabi or Teachable may serve you better.
Circle has been shipping AI features throughout 2025–2026, but the honest assessment is that most of them are locked behind tiers most people won't be on. Here's what matters.
Circle Plus is their premium tier — custom priced, sold by a sales team, and primarily built around one major deliverable: a fully branded iOS and Android app under your name rather than Circle's. Your logo. Your app name. Your presence in the App Store.
I've worked with multiple Circle Plus clients. I know what they're paying. Here's my honest take: I struggle to identify the business case for most community operators at that price point.
Your members are not choosing your community because of which company's logo is on the app icon on their phone. They're choosing it because of the community itself — the people, the content, the events, the access to you. The Circle-branded app is clean, fast, and fully featured. I use it every day. My members use it every day. Not one of them has ever mentioned caring that it says Circle.
Use the default Circle app. Spend the difference on community programming, content, marketing, and team. In almost every case I've worked through, that's the better investment by a significant margin.
Two main plans, a custom Circle Plus tier above Business, and a few add-ons worth knowing about. Here's the full picture.
Priced separately from the community plan. Starts at $19/month for up to 1,000 contacts, scales up from there. Optional — you can use an external email tool. Recommended if you're on Business and using Workflows, because the integration between workflow triggers and Email Hub emails is the cleanest community email experience available.
One cost to know at scale: at 30,000 contacts the Email Hub runs $300/month additional. Plan for that if you're building toward those numbers.
Standard trial is 14 days, no credit card required. Through my affiliate link you also get access to my Circle community's dedicated Tech Help space — ask questions anytime, direct access to me — plus my weekly Q&A office hours where you can join live, share your screen, and get real answers on your Circle setup.
Three real situations where Circle was the clear right answer.
A client running a parenting community had built their setup on WordPress with 20 plugins — integrations for membership, course delivery, discussion, and payment held together by plugins that didn't always play well with each other. Every update was a risk. Every new feature required researching whether there was a plugin for it.
We moved everything to Circle. The community now runs on a single platform — no plugins, no patch anxiety, and a member experience that looks substantially more professional than what WordPress was producing. The technical overhead is nearly zero by comparison. The community is thriving.
A client was paying several hundred dollars per month to ActiveCampaign for their email platform. Good tool — but expensive when your email list is primarily made up of community members and the integration between email and community is maintained via Zapier.
We moved their member email into Circle's Email Hub, where the integration with their access groups and workflows made the email behavior more intelligent than what they had before. Community-triggered emails, access-based segmentation, workflow-driven onboarding. The cost dropped significantly and the integration improved.
A client had been on Mighty Networks for several years and was frustrated with the admin complexity. Getting things done required more steps than it should. The interface felt bloated. Every time they wanted to make a structural change to their community, it was a project.
They moved to Circle and their reaction was immediate. The admin experience was dramatically simpler. Setting up access groups took minutes rather than an afternoon. Building a workflow required no documentation. Their members commented unprompted on how much cleaner the interface felt.
I've migrated clients to Circle from most of the major platforms. Here's the honest version of what to expect — and the one migration consideration most people don't think about until it's too late.
The cleanest migration. Community structure maps well. Courses transfer with some rebuilding. Member data exports cleanly. Plan for 2–3 weeks for a thorough migration.
Community content migrates. Courses can be rebuilt. The critical note: your active Skool subscriptions are in Skool's system, not Stripe — they cannot be migrated. Members must re-subscribe manually. Plan your transition accordingly.
Straightforward if the HighLevel community was lightly used. Complex course structures will need to be rebuilt in Circle's more capable course system.
Usually the most relieving migration for clients. The plugin complexity goes away. The main work is moving course content and rebuilding access structure in Circle's access group system.
Circle is not a painful platform to migrate to. It's well-documented, the support community is active, and Circle's onboarding is the best I've seen in this category. If you want help mapping out or executing a migration, that's what Tech Help Calls are for.
Book a Tech Help CallThe questions I get asked most often, with my real answers.
Everything I've made on Circle — walkthroughs, deep dives, and real implementations.
Pick the path that fits where you are.
No credit card required. Through my affiliate link you also get access to my Circle Tech Help community space and weekly Q&A office hours. Direct access to me during the window that matters most.
Start Your Free TrialYou want Circle set up correctly — access groups, workflows, paywalls, events, courses — and you don't want to spend months figuring it out. I do Circle implementations directly.
See Circle ServicesConvology+ runs on Circle. If you want to see a mature, fully-built Circle community from the inside while getting access to my full tutorial library, this is the place.
Join Convology+You're almost there but stuck on something specific. One-hour blocks, available as one-off sessions or in 3- or 5-call bundles for ongoing support.
Book a Tech Help Call